| Background Color |
| White |
| Yellow |
| Black |
|
|
|
|
First I must tell you that not everyone believes in or practices the Rede. Those who don't are not wrong, evil, or misguided. Do not judge anyone based solely on whether they accept the rede or not. The concept of the rede was invented by Gerald Gardener and is based upon a principle established by Alestair Crowley that Gardener modified. It is not ancient, it came into being in this century. Those who follow traditions older than that do not use it, those who follow systems based upon ancient religions don't use it, it is only used by those who practice Wicca in the manner begun by Gerald Gardener. People who consider themselves Pagan, witches, Asatru, Fairy or Celtic have their own forms of ethical admonitions, but the rede isn't one of them. It in not required that you follow the rede or accept it as a guiding principle. In it's purest form the Wiccan Rede is "An it harm none, do what ye will". This is not as simple as it may sound. Let us examine the wording. Current thinking in many circles is that this is an injunction against causing harm to another, which they interpret to include such things as doing a healing for someone that they did not request, casting a love spell or otherwise manipulating another person to suit your notion of what will do them good. Afterall, the ill may be deriving a benefit from their illness. Perhaps they utilize it as an emotional or psychological crutch and are not ready to do without this familiar friend. The reasoning is if you go and muddle about in their affairs, and succeed in healing them, they could be entirely cast adrift, without the coping mechanism they require. In that case you would have caused harm, even though that was not your intent. Then there is the argument that on occasion it is necessary to cast a spell for your own defense that may as a result harm another. For example, if you are under psychic attack and you do a powerful protective spell, the forces that were unleashed by the attacker have nowhere to go but back to them. In this case however, you are not the one causing the harm, they produced their own downfall by attacking another. They shall reap what they have sown. This is as it should be, remember the Law of Threefold Return (if you believe it) and Karma. There is also the case of inadvertant harm where for example you have cast a spell to achieve a goal that you desire. There may be others attempting to reach that same goal who will not achieve it because you do. That fabulous job you just must have for example. Others surely have interviewed for this position if it's that wonderful. In this situation however, any harm accruing to others is outside your control and not as a result of any intent on your part. Do these occasions violate the rede? My personal feeling on the matter is that this modern interpretation of the rede ignores the original meaning which was to say that if no one is harmed, it's alright to do. This says nothing about if it does harm it isn't alright. I personally do not believe in doing magic to harm others and you will find none on this site. When the intent is good, I feel that it is safe to proceed trusting that if the result you seek is not as things should be, the answer will be no. Some forces are simply not within your power to alter. Of course there may be repercussions for you if you cast a lust spell to make someone interested. You may end up affected more than they are in the end, tied to some hopeless affair that was never meant to be. If you are willing to take the chance, and live with the karma, it's up to you. This is entirely my own opinion, take it for what it's worth, but consider this quote from Janet and Stewart Farrar "The Rede is the philosophy of taking responsibility for your own actions during every moment of your life. It is of course a positive Law as opposed to the negative Laws of the Old and New Testaments. This immediately makes it a life affirming statement, but also means having to think about all your actions and what effects they will have on yourself, other people, society as a whole and your environment, not just now but also in the future." |
|
| The following are two somewhat longer versions of the Wiccan Rede that are often quoted. They are more poetic than the basic rede and are frequently used by covens and solitaires in the craft. | |
The Wiccan Rede, Short VersionBide the
Wiccan Laws we must |
|
The Wiccan RedeThis is the long version written by Lady Gwen (Gwynne) ThompsonBide the
Wiccan Redes ye must, |